The Annual Comparison That Shows Which Project Type Actually Makes You Money

At the end of the year, most freelancers look at total revenue. Maybe they break it down by client. Rarely do they break it down by project type.

That is the comparison worth running. Because the work that made you the most money and the work that paid you the best per hour are almost never the same projects.

Why Revenue Hides the Real Story

Imagine you had two types of projects last year. Strategy consulting and production work. You billed $40,000 from each type. Total revenue looks equal.

But strategy consulting took 200 hours. Production work took 600 hours.

Your effective rate on consulting was $200 an hour. On production it was about $67 an hour. Same revenue line. Very different result.

If you are only looking at what each type brought in, you might keep balancing your workload between the two. If you look at what each type paid per hour, you restructure around consulting immediately.

How to Run the Comparison

Pull all your completed projects from the past 12 months. Group them by project type or service category. For each group, add up total billed revenue and total logged hours.

Divide revenue by hours for each group. That gives you effective hourly rate by project type.

Then rank them. You will probably be surprised by the order.

The project type at the top of the list is where you want to direct more of your time and energy next year. The project type at the bottom is worth examining before you take on more of it.

What Makes a Project Type Profitable

High-margin project types usually share a few characteristics.

They have clear scope boundaries. It is hard for them to expand without a conversation. This means revision creep and scope drift are limited.

They play to your strengths. When you are genuinely fast and skilled at something, your effective rate goes up because the quality-to-hour ratio is high.

They have defined deliverables. Clients know what done looks like. There is less back and forth, fewer revision rounds, and faster sign-off.

Low-margin project types tend to have the opposite profile. Fuzzy scope, lots of iteration, and deliverables that clients struggle to evaluate.

The Second Thing the Comparison Shows

Beyond which type pays best, the comparison shows you where your quoting is off.

If production work is consistently lower margin than you expect, you are either underquoting the hours or absorbing time that should be billable. Both are fixable if you can see the pattern.

If a project type consistently comes in at higher margin than you quoted, you might be underpricing it. Clients are getting a deal and you are leaving money behind.

The comparison does not tell you which to fix. It tells you which to look at.

How Time-Trak Makes This Comparison Possible

This analysis only works if your projects are categorized and your time is logged consistently. That means setting up project types or service categories before work starts, not after.

In Time-Trak, you can tag projects and log hours against specific tasks within each project. When you pull a report at year end, you can group by project type and see total hours and total billed revenue side by side.

If you have been logging everything including revision rounds, admin time, and pre-project work, the numbers will be accurate. If you have only been logging the work you felt confident billing, the numbers will look better than they are.

The point of the annual comparison is not to feel good about your year. It is to decide what next year looks like. That decision is much sharper when it comes from actual hours, not from memory or revenue totals.

Track your time, bill every minute.

Time-Trak is a native Mac and Windows time tracker with a floating timer, automatic screenshots, and one-click invoicing.

Free during beta.

macOS + Windows · Floating widget · Auto screenshots